Data, Reports & Resources

NRDC is a leader and trusted source in environmental policy and research. 

From reports to issue briefs, we ensure accountability through peer review led by our Science Office, which provides data and scientific analysis that help shape and guide NRDC’s policies and positions. We also offer a range of other resources, such as 101 guides and consumer-focused scorecards to increase access to knowledge about how everyone can be a catalyst for change. 

Featured Reports & Resources

Skip carousel items
A view of the cross-section of a cut water pipe

Getting the Lead Out: Removing Lead Pipes Would Yield Hundreds of Billions of Dollars in Health Benefits

Issue BriefUnited StatesErik D. Olson
Removing lead service lines could save the United States an estimated $786 billion from avoided health impacts over the next 35 years.
Bits of plastic waste float underwater

The Worst of the Worst: High-Priority Plastic Materials, Chemical Additives, and Products to Phase Out

Fact SheetUnited States, InternationalDr. Veena Singla
Two workers installing a battery in a vehicle in an assembly plant

Building Batteries Better: Doing the Best With Less

ReportUnited StatesJordan Brinn
Reducing the amount of mining needed through improvements in battery technology, second-life applications for vehicle batteries, and better recycling is key to reducing harms caused from battery supply chains.

All Reports & Resources

Viewing 1 - 20 of 291

Active filters:

Remove all filters

Filter Results

Comments of NRDC and Clean Air Task Force on Reliability Issues (PDF)

Comments
NRDC and Clean Air Task Force submitted data and analysis showing that the carbon dioxide emission standards EPA proposed in May 2023 are feasible to implement without any compromise of electricity system reliability. We show how elements of the current...

Post-Conference Comments of NRDC and Clean Air Task Force on FERC (PDF)

Comments
Natural Resources Defense Council and Clean Air Task Force (NRDC and CATF) respectfully submit these comments in response to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission’s (FERC or Commission) November 14, 2023 notice inviting comments (Notice) concerning the November 9, 2023 Commissioner-led...

GOM PEIS Scoping - Comments (PDF)

Comments
A coalition of ENGOs, including NRDC, commented on the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management’s (BOEM) scoping notice in advance of preparing a programmatic environmental impact statement for offshore oil and gas leasing in the Gulf of Mexico under the 2024-2029...

BOEM Call for Information - Comments (PDF)

Comments
A coalition of ENGOs, including NRDC, commented on the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management’s (BOEM) request for information and nominations for areas to consider for offshore oil and gas leasing in the Gulf of Mexico under the 2024-2029 five-year program.

Comments on the Core Principles for Effective Banking Supervision (PDF)

Comments
The Basel Committee for Banking Supervision has proposed revisions, for the first time in more than a decade, to the Core Principles for Effective Banking Supervision, which is their global standard for the sound prudential regulation and supervision of banks...

Comments on EPA’s Proposed MCLs for Six PFAS with Exhibits (PDF)

Comments
NRDC, as part of a coalition of 36 organizations, submitted comments on the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s proposed National Primary Drinking Water Regulation for six PFAS. Also included as exhibits are technical comments and further review of EPA’s quantified health...

NRDC Comments on the NYNJHAT Study - Comments (PDF)

Comments
NRDC's public comments on the New York-New Jersey Harbor and Tributaries Coastal Storm Risk Management Draft Integrated Feasibility Study and Tier 1 Environmental Impact Assessment in which the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers seeks to develop a plan to protect...

NRDC Comments on EPA’s Draft White Paper "Availability of New Approach Methodologies (NAMs) in the Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program (EDSP)" (PDF)

Comments
Comments to EPA submitted on behalf of NRDC and the 35 groups and individuals which include: farmworker advocates; environmental justice leaders; fenceline community representatives; health professionals; environmental health groups; grassroots activists; lawyers; scientists; and technical experts. The comments conclude that...